ASF Core
One platform for safety and security engineering. From concept to compliance.
Requirements, safety and cybersecurity analyses, review and evidence in one workspace. Work manually or let AI draft; engineers approve every row, and every decision stays traceable, across five industry profiles.
- ISO 26262
- ISO/SAE 21434
- EN 50126
- ISO 14971
- IEC 61511
- ARP4761A
How it works
A governed workflow, not a blank chat
Each step builds on reviewed work, so goals, requirements and controls only use what an engineer has checked.
01/05Upload project documents
Specifications, requirements, prior analyses and standards ground every suggestion.
ASF Core
Current artifact and industry coverage
Systems engineering, safety and cybersecurity in one workspace. Available work products depend on the industry profile and configuration.
Available
- Project, system and item definitions
- Requirements and requirement baselines
- Functions, scenarios and assumptions
- Architecture, interfaces and evidence links
- Baselines and side-by-side diff with a change stepper: added and removed table rows, changed tree nodes and requirement wording
Available
- HARA, safety goals, FSC, TSC, FSR and TSR
- Safety scope, safety plan and safety concepts
- FMEA, FMEDA, FTA, ETA, DIA, TCA, FHA, HAZOP and LOPA
- Safety case, confirmation review, audit, assessment, configuration baseline, safety release (manual)
- Hardware/software requirements, verification and validation records
Available
- RAMS plans, RAM targets and demonstrations
- Hazard logs and safety requirements
- Safety-related application conditions (SRAC)
- Safety cases, assessment, acceptance and operational records
Beta
- Assets, threat scenarios and attack paths
- Vulnerabilities, risks and risk treatment
- Cybersecurity goals, requirements, controls and claims
- Verification, security events and incident-response plans
Available · early access
- ReqIF 1.0.1 requirements import and export
- Requirements sync with Polarion, Codebeamer, DOORS Next and Jama Connect (early access)
- Jira work items and Ansys medini analyze exchange (early access)
- Share from one Sharing Center: handoff packages with manifests, workbook exports per lifecycle group, ReqIF and connectors
Industry profiles
- AutomotiveISO 26262 · ISO/SAE 21434HARA, safety concepts, FMEA and TARA
- RailwayEN 50126 / IEC 62278 · EN 50128 · EN 50129 / IEC 62425 · CLC/TS 50701RAMS, hazard logs, safety cases and assurance
- Medical devicesISO 14971 · IEC 62304 · IEC 81001-5-1Risk analysis, risk controls and evidence
- Process industryIEC 61511 · IEC 61508 · ISA/IEC 62443HAZOP, LOPA, SIL-oriented review and security
- AviationARP4761A · ARP4754B · DO-326AAircraft/system context, FHA and security profiles
FMEDA captures inputs and external analysis references; ASF does not calculate PMHF. The value is shown as not computable, with the reason. Safety case, confirmation review, functional safety audit and assessment, configuration baseline and safety release are available as manually maintained work products, without AI generation. Supplier, tool-confidence, reuse and field records support recording and review, without automated qualification or release. Industry profiles do not imply certification or tool qualification.
Connectors
Works with the tools you already run
Pair requirements with your ALM, track work in Jira and exchange analyses with medini analyze. Inbound changes are previewed and reviewed; ASF never approves or transitions items in the other tool.
Polarion ALMRequirements syncEarly access
CodebeamerRequirements syncEarly access
IBM DOORS NextRequirements syncEarly access
Jama ConnectRequirements syncEarly access
Jira CloudWork items and statusEarly access
Ansys medini analyzeHazard analysis exchangeEarly access- ReqIF 1.0.1Import and exportAvailable
- Early-access connectors run in pilot scope and are qualified against your installation.
Early validation
Checked against the standard, not just demoed
Independent ISO 26262 gap analysis
Item definition and HARA checked clause by clause
In September 2026 an independent functional safety consultant from Germany (ten years in automotive safety management and ISO 26262 assessments, independence level I3) checked the item definition and HARA workflows in ASF Core against ISO 26262-3:2018 Clauses 5 and 6 (58 requirements) in two working sessions and delivered a written gap-analysis report. Open findings are being closed. A gap analysis is not an ISO 26262-2 assessment or evidence of conformity.
AltaLab Fall 2026
Altair Capital accelerator sprint
Aegis SafeForge took part in the AltaLab Fall 2026 online sprint, Altair Capital’s programme for early-stage AI companies (closed September 2026). Positioning, wedge and go-to-market were worked through with the programme’s mentors.
Design-partner pilots
First pilots are being scoped now
Pilots run on one real workflow with your own data and named reviewers, with acceptance criteria agreed up front. Pilot findings shape the roadmap.
Become a design partner →Scope and method of the review are described to pilot candidates on request.
Savings calculator
What does compliance friction cost your team?
Estimate the engineering time recovered when drafting, review state, traceability and evidence reuse move into one governed workflow.
- Annual savings
- €100,320
- Monthly value
- €8,360
- Hours per year
- 1,056 h
Planning model, not a guarantee. Default assumption: 3 hours per person per week currently spent on spreadsheet status chasing, evidence assembly, trace maintenance and review preparation. Plus roughly 864 coordination hours per year at 6 review cycles a month. A pilot verifies the figures against your baseline.
Review pilot value →Go deeper
Bring your current workflow. We’ll show you how ASF can improve it.
45 minutes with the team, using an item or product of your choice. We reply within one business day.